Written
in the late 1800s of France, a time period often called “Belle Époque” (Lovely
Age/Grand Years), “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant explores the human
tendency to desire much more than one could afford. This short story
specifically revolves around an attractive yet dissatisfied young woman named
Mathilde Loisel, who longs for a better change of fate. Mathilde deplores her
poverty while her modest husband, Monsieur Loisel, expresses his pleasure at
the little things in life. This contrast between the two characters foreshadows
the impending conflict.
Mathilde
flaunts extraordinary beauty regardless of her unsatisfying financial status.
She is “pretty and charming,” however her life as a wife of a lowly clerk in
the Ministry of Education leaves more to be desired. Although she is very aware
of her husband’s economic situation, she begs for a large sum of money to buy
formalwear for a grand party they’ve both been invited to. As selfless as he
is, Monsieur speaks no more and hands over the hard-earned money. Despite this,
she craves more, reaching out to her wealthy friend to lend her diamond
necklace. This greed eventually results in a tragic mistake: Mathilde loses the
luxurious jewels on the way home from the ball. Again, although it was solely
Mathilde’s fault, Monsieur searches high and low for the necklace that his wife
lost. When they realize that they can never find the necklace, they attempt to
buy a similar necklace of the same value, beginning to live a life of crippling
poverty. Without complaining, Monsieur faces the dark future that his wife had
induced, displaying his unchanging love for Mathilde. They then spend ten years
of hardship to pay off their financial debt, Mathilde losing her youthful
beauty in the process. She wonders, “What would have happened if she had never
lost those jewels? Who knows? Who knows? How strange life is, how fickle! How
little is needed to ruin or to save!” Despite the life of struggles that she had
commenced for both she and her husband, Mathilde fails to learn from her
mistakes. She should be regretting her greed and desire to borrow the jewels in
the first place instead of asking herself what would have happened if she
hadn’t lost them. Life is not fickle; it is Mathilde who made life seem fickle.
At the end, she meets her friend, Madame Forestier, whom she had lost the
jewels from. Mathilde learns that the diamond necklace that she had lost was
not worth anything; she and her husband spent ten years of their life replacing
a necklace that was only fraction of what they paid off.
No comments:
Post a Comment